Alex asks: “I own an apartment that is rented out and almost debt-free, and a house that is still pretty high in debt. My plan is to sell the apartment, and use the money to pay off the major amount of debt on my house. What do you think?”
[powerpress]
Question 20 – Should I Sell My Apartment To Pay Mortgage? – Shownotes
Today’s question comes from Alex:
I own an apartment that is rented out and almost debt-free, and a house that is still pretty high in debt. My plan is to sell the apartment, and use the money to pay off the major amount (about 70%) of debt on my house, leaving me with about 90k in debt which will be very easy/cheap for me to pay off.
The facts:
• House debt: £290k @1.75% interest, house value £350k
• Apartment debt: zero, market value: £220k.
• Yearly net income from rent: £10k (after putting aside 10% for upkeep and repairs). 30% income tax on that, so make it £7k.
• Return on apartment value: 3% per year based on market value.
I am starting to think it would be a better idea to keep on paying the relatively low interest debt on the house, and take the income from the apartment as a return on investment, because let’s face it, where can I get that kind of return in the finance market right now, and with relatively low risk?
I think it’s mostly the subconscious desire of wanting to be free of debt in a certain timeframe, even though the interest is low and I will lose a steady income.
Thanks for your question Alex. I’m firstly going to answer it from a purely mathematical standpoint and then discuss other factors after.
Let’s look at your current situation as a whole.
How You Currently Stand…
- Total assets: £350k house, £220k apartment
- Invested: £280k
- Mortgage: £290k
- Annual apartment income after tax: £7,000
- Annual expense of own home mortgage: £5,075
- Annual return = £1,925 / Investment = £280,000 = ROI of 0.7%
- Capital growth of 5% pa = £28,500
- ROI with cap growth = 10.9% pa
…Or If You Were To Sell…
If you were to sell the apartment and pay down the house debt:
- Total assets: £350k house
- Invested: £280k
- Mortgage: £70k
- Annual expense of own home mortgage: £1,225
- Annual return: -0.4% pa
- Capital gains of 5% = £17,500
- ROI with cap growth = 5.8% pa
Therefore, your return is currently better, and hence we would recommend (mathematically) sticking with how you are.
Other Considerations
Other factors to consider:
- Risk – Having a £290k mortgage is (theoretically) more risky that having a £70k mortgage. Therefore, you need to think about your monthly cash flow and whether you’d ever have an issue with servicing the £290k mortgage.
- Diversification – depending on your overall net worth, you may be overly invested in property compared to other asset classes (such as stocks and shares). Therefore, another option may be to sell the apartment and only repay some of the mortgage and invest the proceeds in long-term assets in a different asset class (returning better than the 3.2%).
- Opportunity cost – A cash-on-cash return from an investment property of 3.2% (£7,000 over the £220,000 value) isn’t great. If you do want to invest in property, there will be better returns available.
I, personally, due to my attitude to risk, would be trying to maximise my ROI. The mortgage is actually helping to do this (by leveraging good debt) but the investment property (unless the fundamentals are amazing and your annual cap growth is off the charts) isn’t the most effective way of currently doing this. As such, selling may be an option (consider all fees and costs), but not primarily to pay off the mortgage.
Ask Your Question
This show runs three times a week and answers all of your personal finance questions. If you have any questions, please don’t be shy to ask. You can ask in three ways:
- Leave a comment on any of the Q&A podcast shownotes (including this one)
- Email me at moneystepper@gmail.com
- Leave a message on the Speakpipe App which you will find below and on our “submit a question” page:
Great analysis and recommendation.
Barring a better investment opportunity for the apartment funds, no point selling it, especially not to pay down the other mortgage.
While I am a big fan of being debt free, the one debt I’m comfortable with is mortgage debt, especially on rental property. As large as you have a good positive cash flow and ROI, with a nice buffer in case of rent downturns, having a mortgage on a rental property makes sense.
So many people focus on eliminating all debt, that you can end up making bad decisions. Most businesses run on debt. Rental property is a business. Being debt free in your personal life makes sense. Being debt free in business means losing out on many if not most opportunities. Debt is fine as long as you’re smart about it.
Interesting post! I like the way you compare the ROIs of the two scenarios. I’ve been debating selling rental property recently as well which has appreciated pretty well in the last couple of years. I have 6 rentals which aren’t the best investment options out there (I bought them before I really understood CAP rates), however they do cash flow as a group and I have very cheap fixed rate mortgages on them.
The cost to sell would be high due to sales commissions, etc., and there’s nothing specific I need the equity for if I were to sell them (stocks, bonds, and real estate all seem rather overpriced currently, and paying down my very cheap debts also isn’t terribly compelling from a long term perspective). So the easiest thing to do is just hold them. I should probably run some more specific numbers though.
Here is a calculator I stumbled upon the other day that might help you (check the advanced options to put in what you’re paying a property manager, etc.).
http://www.allpropertymanagement.com/resources/rent-or-sell.html#
Honestly my hunch is that you’re better off holding it for awhile longer. A loss of $600 a month hurts, but a) you’re also building equity each month, b) you’re getting some tax benefit, even if it’s deferred until sale before you can recognize the compounding losses.
More importantly though, if it costs you $20K to dump the place that is nearly 3 years of losses at your current rate ($20K/$600 = 33.33). So you can calculate a breakeven analysis based on how much it will take to dump the property once you know more about that precise figure. Using the $20K loss example (remember to include costs to fix it up plus realtor commissions), then if you think the value will increase by more than $20K in three years, it makes sense to hold on (rents could go up in that time frame too by the way). If you think it’s doubtful the value will have recovered to that level in three years, then go ahead and dump it now.
So sorry! This last comment was meant for another blog post…I had several windows open at once. However the calculator I referenced may help in this situation too! 🙂